General Assessment Guidance
·
Your summative assessment for this module is made up of
this 2500-word submission, which accounts for 100% of your final module mark.
·
A total of 100 marks are available for this module
assessment and you are required to achieve minimum 50% to pass this module.
·
The deadline for submission is shown on the submission
link. Please note late submissions will not be marked.
·
You are required to submit all elements of your
assessment in one Word document, via The Hub Assessment area. Only submissions
made via the specified mode will be accepted and hard copies or any other
digital form of submissions (such as via email or pen drive etc.) will not be
accepted.
·
For coursework, the submission word limit is 2500 words, excluding your list of
references. You must comply with the word count guidelines. You may submit LESS
than 2500 words but not more. Word Count guidelines can be found
on your programme home page and the coursework submission page.
·
Do not put your name or contact details
anywhere on your submission. You should only put your student
registration number (SRN) which will ensure your submission is recognised in
the marking process.
·
You are required to use only Harvard Referencing
System in your submission. Any content which is already published by other
author(s) and is not referenced will be considered as a case of plagiarism.
·
You can find further information on Harvard
Referencing in the online library on The Hub. You can use the following link to
access this information: https://bpp.libguides.com/Home/StudySupport
·
BPP University has a strict policy regarding
authenticity of assessments. In proven instances of plagiarism or collusion,
severe punishment will be imposed on offenders. You are advised to read the
rules and regulations regarding plagiarism and collusion in the GARs and MOPP
which are available on The Hub in the Academic registry section.
You should include
a completed copy of the Assignment Cover
sheet. Any submission without this completed Assignment Cover sheet
may be considered invalid and not marked.
Assessment Brief
This assessment brief gives you an overview of the summative assessment of this module. The learning outcomes below will be tested in the assessment contained in this brief.
.1. MODULE LEARNING OUTCOMES (LOS)
LO1: Critically evaluate the value of emerging technologies as they apply to a business context
LO2: Appraise various emerging technologies and the value of these to business
LO3: Critically evaluate trends of technology and their application to business strategy
.2. ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW
In this assignment you will write a two-part report about emerging technology in the context of an organisation of your choice. You will also be assessed on the overall professionalism of your report and your use of referencing (10% of module mark).
Assessment Part 1 (60% of module marks)
In this part of the assessment, you will need to reflect the learnings throughout this module and consider the learning outcomes particularly:
· LO1: Critically evaluate the value of emerging technologies as they apply to a business context
· LO2: Appraise various emerging technologies and the value of these to business
Write a report for external consumption, of no more than 1500 words, that identifies, appraises, and evaluates two emerging technologies that could be (further) adopted within an organisation of your choice. This report should be clearly articulated within the context of your chosen organisation and make use of a range of appropriate sources to support your arguments.
See section 3 of this brief for the recommended structure of this part of the report.
Assessment Part 2 (40% of module marks)
In this part of the assessment, you will need to reflect the learnings throughout this module and consider the learning outcome particularly:
· LO3: Critically evaluate trends of technology and their application to business strategy
Write a report for external consumption, of no more than 1000 words, that identifies and evaluates a trend in technology that has the potential to influence the strategic direction of your selected organisation. This report should be clearly articulated within your selected organisational context and make use of a range of appropriate sources to support your arguments.
See section 3 of this brief for the recommended
structure of this part of the report.
.3. ASSESSMENT STRUCTURE
Your summative report (maximum 2,500 words) should
include:
·
A completed Cover Sheet (not included in word count)
·
Executive Summary (at most 300 words, not included in
word count): An overview of your findings, highlighting the current state of
emerging technology within your selected organisation and future opportunities
for adopting emerging technology.
·
Part 1: Adopting Emerging
Technologies at your Organisation (approx. 1,500 words total)
(a)
Introduction (approx.
300 words): describe the context your selected organisation currently operates
in and identify any factors that you believe would be relevant to the adoption
of the emerging technologies you discuss in this part of the report.
(b)
Emerging
Technologies (approx. 1000 words): identify and analyse two distinct
emerging technologies, either of which may have begun to be adopted or could be
adopted in the future by your selected organisation. This should include for
each technology:
1.
an explanation of why it should be considered emerging
given the organisational context,
2.
an analysis of the extent of its adoption within your
selected organisation to date, and how it could be (further) adopted by your
selected organisation, and
3.
a critical appraisal of its value within the
organisational context of your selected organisation.
(c)
Conclusion (approx.
200 words): critically evaluate the two technologies identified in the previous
section and make clear recommendation(s) for your selected organisation around
the adoption of them, considering their potential value to your selected organisation.
·
Part 2: A
Future Trend in Technology and your Organisation’s Strategic Direction (approx.
1000 words total)
(d)
Introduction (approx.
300 words): building on your introduction from part 1, describe the current
strategic direction that your selected organisation is taking.
(e)
A Future
Trend in Technology (approx. 500 words): identify and critically evaluate
a specific trend in technology in the context of your selected organisation and
its strategic direction.
(f)
Conclusion (approx.
200 words): make clear recommendations for your selected organisation based on
your analysis of its current strategic direction and the potential impact of
the trend in technology you identified.
·
References (not included in word count): list the
academic research cited within your project, using the Harvard reference
format.
Appendices (not
included in word count and not marked): additional content supporting the
findings within your report.
Marking Criteria
|
Criterion |
|
0-49% |
|
50-59% |
|
60-69% |
|
70-100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Fail |
|
Pass |
|
Merit |
|
Distinction |
|
Understanding |
Identify and
analyse |
|
Limited knowledge base that |
|
Satisfactory knowledge base; |
|
Good knowledge base, exploring |
|
Excellent information and knowledge |
|
context (30%) |
|
begins
to explore and analyse |
|
explores
and explicitly analyses |
|
and
analysing emerging |
|
base
which deeply explores and analyses |
|
|
|
relevant
emerging |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
technologies for |
|
emerging
technologies |
|
emerging
technologies appropriate |
|
technologies
appropriate for the |
|
emerging
technologies appropriate for |
|
|
|
appropriate for the
selected |
|
for the selected
organisation with a |
|
selected organisation with
clear |
|
the selected organisation
with |
|
|
|
your selected |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
organisation in a limited
way. |
|
satisfactory level of
detail |
|
originality and autonomy. |
|
considerable originality
and autonomy. |
|
|
|
organisational |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Lacks the necessary depth
or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
clear linkages to the
selected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Part 1 (a), (b.1), |
|
organisation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Knowledge |
(b.2)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
potential
value of |
|
value emerging tech may
bring to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critically
appraise |
|
Limited knowledge base. |
|
Satisfactory understanding of the |
|
Good
and clear understanding of |
|
Thorough
and deep appraisal of the value |
|
|
and evaluate
the |
|
Some limited appreciation
of the |
|
value
emerging tech may bring to |
|
the
value emerging tech may bring |
|
emerging
tech may bring to the learners’ |
|
|
|
|
|
the
learners’ selected organisation |
|
to
the learners’ selected |
|
selected
organisation with very clear |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
emerging |
|
the learners’ selected |
|
with some recommendations
for |
|
organisation with |
|
recommendations and
impacts of the |
|
|
|
|
the adoption of emerging
tech by |
|
recommendations for the
adoption |
|
adoption of emerging tech
by the |
||
|
|
technologies
for |
|
organisation. Lacking in
the |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
the business. May be
lacking some |
|
of emerging tech by the
business. |
|
business. |
||
|
|
your selected |
|
necessary
depth and analysis to |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
depth. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
organisation
(30%) |
|
award
a pass. |
|
|
Application
of current and |
|
Excellent and detailed usage of
recent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
(Part 1 (b.3) and (c)) |
|
|
|
Use
of some appropriate |
|
emerging
thoughts and practices |
|
emerging
thought at the forefront of the |
|
|
|
|
|
references. |
|
from the discipline
through |
|
discipline using entirely
appropriate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
appropriate references. |
|
external sources of
information. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criterion |
|
|
0-49% |
|
50-59% |
|
60-69% |
|
70-100% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Fail |
|
Pass |
|
Merit |
|
Distinction |
|
|
Critically
evaluate |
|
Limited knowledge base: Some |
|
Satisfactory understanding of the |
|
Good and clear understanding of |
|
Excellent. Thorough and deep
knowledge |
|
|
|
the impact a
trend in |
|
limited
appreciation of the |
|
impact
emerging tech could have |
|
the
impact emerging tech could |
|
and
understanding of the impact |
|
|
|
technology could |
|
impact
emerging tech could have |
|
on
the strategic direction of the |
|
have
on the strategic direction of |
|
emerging
tech could have on the |
|
|
|
|
on the strategic direction
of the |
|
learners’ selected
organisation. |
|
the learners’ selected
organisation. |
|
strategic direction of the
learners’ |
||
|
|
have on your |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
learners’ selected
organisation |
|
Some recommendations made
but |
|
Clear recommendations
made. |
|
selected organisation.
Very clear |
||
|
|
selected |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
but lacking the depth of |
|
lacking real depth in
areas. |
|
|
|
recommendations for the
organisation |
||
|
|
organisation’s |
|
|
|
Clear
application of current and |
|
||||
|
|
|
discussion required for a
pass. |
|
|
|
|
based on this critical
analysis. |
|||
|
|
strategic
direction |
|
|
Some
application of current and |
|
emerging
thoughts and practices |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
(30%) |
|
|
|
|
emerging
thoughts and practices |
|
from
the discipline. |
|
Excellent and detailed usage of
recent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
from the discipline
through the use |
|
|
|
emerging thought at the
forefront of the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
(Part 2) |
|
|
|
of external sources. |
|
|
|
discipline. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skills |
Academic
skills & |
|
Limited academic/intellectual |
|
Satisfactory academic/intellectual |
|
Good academic/intellectual skills. |
|
Excellent academic/intellectual
skills. |
|
|
Referencing
(10%) |
|
skills.
Original work with personal |
|
skills.
Wholly original work with |
|
Demonstrates
intellectual |
|
Demonstrates
intellectual originality, |
||
|
|
|
|
reflection
and broad evidence- |
|
good
reflection and solid, well- |
|
originality
and imagination |
|
integrity,
coherence and imagination. |
|
|
Cognitive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
based critique. Solid
structure |
|
reasoned judgements
forming from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and accuracy in
expression. |
|
evidence-based critique.
Consistent |
|
Good with precise, full and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practical/professional
skills |
|
structure and accuracy in |
|
appropriate references and
notes |
|
Excellent with precise, full and |
|
|
|
|
|
evident. |
|
expression.
Practical/professional |
|
at a high standard. |
|
appropriate references and
notes at near- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
skills established. |
|
|
|
publishing standard |
|
|
|
|
|
Limited and full and appropriate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
references and notes with
minor |
|
Satisfactory with precise, full and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or insignificant errors |
|
appropriate references and
notes |
|
|
|
|