Class

Attributes

Marks

Distinction

Illustrates an excellent level of understanding of complex issues

70-100%

in the subject. All requirements of the work are dealt with to a

high standard and the work is free from all but isolated minor

errors. The material is wholly relevant to the tasks.

Excellent analysis, synthesis and critical reflection with the ability

to tackle issues and questions not previously encountered.

Evidence of independent and original judgment in relation to the

resolution of the client’s needs and problems. Excellently

presented in terms of structure and professional style

Commendation

Illustrates a very good understanding of the issues in the subject,

60 -69%

some of which are likely to be complex with some independent

critical thought appropriate to the tasks. Most of the requirements

of  the  work  are  covered  with  only  a  few  gaps  or  minor  and

inconsequential errors. The material is largely relevant to the tasks

and there is a good attempt at analysis, synthesis and critical

reflection  with  evidence  of  some  ability  to  tackle  issues  not

previously encountered. The work is presented in a clear and well-

organised  manner  with  only  minor  spelling  and  grammatical

errors.

Pass

The work displays good knowledge and understanding and its

50 – 59%

relevance to the task.  The submission exhibits clear analysis and

reasonable use of grammar, spelling and language.  It may

contain errors and lack fluency.  Limited evidence of the ability to

sustain a relevant argument or logical reasoning.

Fail

Exhibits  an  unsatisfactory  grasp  of  the  issues  in  the  subject.

0-49%

Primarily descriptive and lacking in independent critical thought

appropriate to the tasks. Weak or no attempt at analysis, synthesis

and critical reflection with little evidence of ability to tackle issues

not previously encountered. Poor spelling or other grammatical

errors.